In the chapter of one of those articles, that we were advised to read, an actually have already read, the thesis matter is presented is the following citation”is the social sciences are really inferior as compared to the natural ones?” During our discussions and regarding of facts, we concluded and understood that the natural sciences really possess some kind of advantage to maximize in comparison to the social sciences. Nevertheless, as highlighted in the article at hand, these advantage points does not mean that the natural sciences are in some way superior to the social ones in, maybe even on the contrary and depending for whom. This is because of the reason, as specified earlier; one science no way can be an alternate or a substitute of the other one. For the same reason, as the creator of the current article views it, that makes no sense to compare these completely different spheres of knowledge at hand.
In fact, there are many advantages when it comes to the essence and composition of the natural sciences in comparison to the social ones. But, these vantages no way can be regarded during the superiority/inferiority debate; this is already a ground for another discussion. It just should come forward as defiance from the part of the social studies to maximize and make the take the most possible out of the available sources of the social sciences to comply and be as much as possible accustomed to the needs of the modern society and what is really important to be applicable to real life and clear to the masses.
