Mae says:

It’s not difficult to imagine the type of person who would still want this book, but one would prefer not to. Unfortunately it’s still all too relevant. One wishes that Henry Ford’s idea of history as “bunk” was more convincing!

The resurgence of opposition to the phoney “War on Christmas” should remind readers of earlier efforts to attack American Jews.

Hendrik Hertzberg, in a New Yorker article about the ongoing war on Christmas, made a direct connection to this book. He wrote:

… Christmas itself, in something like its recognizably modern

… form, with gifts and cards and elves, dates from the early

… nineteenth century. The War on Christmas seems to have come

… along around a hundred years later, with the publication of

… “The International Jew,” by Henry Ford, the automobile

… magnate, whom fate later punished by arranging to have his

… fortune diverted to the sappy, do-gooder Ford Foundation.

… “It is not religious tolerance in the midst of religious

… difference, but religious attack that they”-the

… Jews-”preach and practice,” he wrote. “The whole record of

… the Jewish opposition to Christmas, Easter and certain

… patriotic songs shows that.” Ford’s anti-Semitism has not

… aged well, thanks to the later excesses of its European

… adherents, but by drawing a connection between

… Christmasbashing and patriotism-scorning he pointed the way

… for future Christmas warriors.

— From “Bah Humbug” http://www.newyorker.com, posted 2005-12-19
Rating: 1 / 5

Etur Oel says:

The book,” The International Jew,” a collection of articles, portents to present a scientific analysis of a problem, both the problem is stated and defined by the Author. The book is clearly aimed at an audience that neither requires, seeks, nor needs any substantiation of statements or claims made regardless of how devastating their effects may be on the affected.

If these articles had been submitted to a scientific body for publication, they would have been rejected out-of-hand being devoid of any Bibliography or References, making it impossible to verify any of the statements.

However, even without this reference material, the contradictions found in this text are so obvious that it is impossible to view it as a serious undertaking.

To be specific, on page 8 it is stated:

“The single description …of Jews …is this: he is in business. It may be only gathering rags and selling them, but he is in business…the Jew is supremely gifted for business.” And on page 14: “…wherever they [the Jews] wandered, the center of business seemed to go with them.”

Yet on pp 33-34 one finds: “Associated with Columbus in the voyage were at least five Jews. Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco, the surgeon; Bernal, the physician; Alonzo de la Calle. and Gabriel Sanchez. The astronomical instruments and maps which the navigators used were of Jewish origin.” Of the surgeon and the physician only the first names are known. How, then was their religion ascertained? In fact, how and from whom was any of this information obtained?

Here we have an Interpreter, a Jew; a Surgeon, a Jew; a Physician, a Jew; and the Navigational Instruments and Maps all made by Jews. WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THOSE IN-BUSINESS JEWS?

Is one to believe that in all of Spain the only Surgeon to be found turned out to be a Jew?

Is one to believe that in all of Spain the only Physician to be found also turned out to be a Jew?

Is one to believe that in all of Spain the only Interpreter to be found turned out to be another Jew?

And in all of Spain, makers of Navigational Instruments and Maps, all turned out to be Jews?

Did the Surgeon sail with Columbus because he was planning to peddle surgical instruments to the ship’s crew?

Did the Physician come aboard to push cough syrup and band-aids at exorbitant prices, having captive consumers at his mercy?

And the Interpreter, did he arrive with a truckload of dictionaries counting on making a huge profit from selling these books to the sailors who had money in their pockets and no place to spend it?

Or would it be more reasonable to assume that, for a voyage of this gravity, Columbus picked the very best he could find.

Now, if that is the case, then it would appear that the “supremely gifted [Jew] for business” turns out to be equally supremely gifted for Languages, Surgery, General Medicine, and the Manual Skills required to create navigational instruments and maps.

Perhaps one other example may prove to be of interest. In this book there are drawn constant comparisons between Jew and Gentile when no comparison on this basis is possible. Whether one considers a Jew a member of a specific race or a specific religion or both, a Gentile is neither: He is not the member of a specific race or the member of a specific religion and, obviously, he cannot belong to both of them.

From the point-of-view of a Jew, a Gentile is anybody who is not a Jew.

From a Mormon’s point-of-view, anybody who is not a Mormon is a Gentile, which leads to the interesting and perhaps even amusing conclusion that from a Mormon’s point of view, A JEW IS A GENTILE!

Last, but by no means least, once it becomes clear that the “The International Jew” is based on “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” the need for proving discrepancies disappears. For decades now a number of independent Historical Scholars have shown that “The Protocols …”are fictitious minutes of meetings that never took place.

Since a Theory based on an erroneous Hypothesis is an erroneous Theory, therefore, a book or series of articles, based on a fictitious account, consequently is itself a fictitious account of the 2nd order.

One may ask, how is it possible that so many have taken these statements for GOSPEL. The only answer I have to offer is this: ” There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!”

There are none so deaf, as those who do not wish to hear!

Rating: 1 / 5